Category: Talking to the Other Side

By Posted on Posted in Democracy, Diversity, Energy & Sustainability, Environment, Ethics in Government, Ethics-International, language, Mindset, Peace and War, Politics, poverty, Protests and Crackdowns, Psychology, Social and Economic Justice, Talking to the Other Side, Uncategorized Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

I admire your constant calls for peace, Donald. I just wish I could believe them. You see, there’s this little problem: saying you want peace isn’t enough. You have to actually BE a peacemaker. And you haven’t been one.

You’ve claimed to end eight wars. Independent fact checking shows that you did in fact have a role in bringing several of those countries to the table, and I commend you for that. However, your grand, sweeping claims that peace wouldn’t have happened without your aggressive diplomacy are highly exaggerated. And several of the peace agreements aren’t exactly working out. For example, the United Nations reports that 339 Palestinians were killed by Israel in the six weeks following the ceasefire. We’ll give you a B-.

You renamed the US Institute of Peace after yourself.  You spent months telling Oslo you deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. Yes, it’s true that some recipients didn’t deserve it either: Barack Obama was new in office and hadn’t done anything significant toward peace at that point. Henry Kissinger was a war criminal responsible for much harm during the Vietnam War, the Chilean Pinochet dictatorship that followed the US-aided coup, and many other foreign policy debacles. But still, if you have to nominate yourself for the peace price and name an institution that is supposed to be independent after yourself, it doesn’t scream “qualified.” It actually says “laughably insecure and demanding.” Grade: D-.

Then there’s Ukraine. You’ve been so inconsistent that nobody knows where you stand. You berate the Ukrainian president in person on national TV. Next, you tell Putin to negotiate. Then you bring forward a proposal so lopsidedly Russia-centric that even Mitch McConnell dismissed the plan and said Putin had made a fool of you. One key principle of peacemaking: It has to include all the sides and let all of them at least claim some small victory, which this plan utterly fails to do. Grade: F.

How about relations with our near neighbors? You’ve killed at least 87 people in 22 separate attacks on vessels in the Caribbean, claiming that they were smuggling drugs. You’ve provided no evidence that this is true (and your long record as a massive serial liar doesn’t boost our confidence). And even if it were true, the proper procedure is to interdict and seize the boat, arrest the crew, and hold the cargo as evidence—not to blow it out of the water without warning. Both Colombia and Venezuela have accused you of extrajudicial murder. At least two of those were killed while clinging to the wreckage after you destroyed their boat, in clear violation of international law.  And it’s hard to believe that you really care about keeping drugs out of this country when you just granted a full pardon to the former president of Honduras, who had just started serving more than 40 years for a huge cocaine smuggling operation. There’s widespread speculation that this is really about setting your sights on Venezuela’s oil, and that you’re willing to start a war against them. Grade: F.

And then there’s your “peacemaking” right here in the  good old United States of America.

  • You send armed, masked goons to snatch honest, hard-working non-criminal immigrants away from jobs, loved ones, and decent places to live,  without a shred of due process. Sometimes, your goons snatch up people who have citizenship or permanent residence. Other times, you target people who are going through all the proper steps of being able to stay legally. This creates terror, not peace. It serves no useful function, disrupts families and the economy, and makes the whole country unsafe. Grade: F.
  • You rip the safety net apart, causing economic dislocation of the kind that encourages crime, making our streets less safe and less peaceful.
  • Your energy policies, pushing the most destructive, resource-intensive, and economically unworkable energy options, will lead to resource conflicts, which will lead to more wars. Grade: F.
  • Finally, your public language is the opposite of a peacemaker’s. You issue all sorts of smears against people of color, non-Christians, people with disabilities, even those who happen to belong to a different political party, as well as people you have specifically named and declared they are your enemies. You are an attack dog with a remarkably thin skin who insults others but has zero tolerance for dissent. To paraphrase Three Dog Night, “That ain’t the way to make peace, please.” Grade: F.

So if you want to be seen as a peacemaker, you have to become one. That’s going to take major restructuring of your whole way of being president. Are you up to the challenge? I’d love to see you succeed at embracing peace and would cheer you on publicly if you’re sincere. I’m not optimistic that you’re up to it—but I’d love to be proven wrong.

 

Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

By Posted on Posted in Activism, Democracy, Diversity, Innovation, Mindset, Peace and War, People Helping People, Politics, Protests and Crackdowns, Social and Economic Justice, Talking to the Other Side Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

In response to my Facebook repost of AOC’s suggestion that instead of ICE thugs, we send 5000 caseworkers to the border to help people immigrate the right way, a friend asked, “Do you really feel “calling out” the GOP will make any difference?”

This is how I answered (embedded links were not part of my answer):

There is something to be said for the throw-it-on-the-wall-and-see-what-sticks school of activism. We never know what will be effectual. Did Randy Kehler know when he went to prison for draft resistance that he would directly inspire Daniel Ellsberg to copy and release the Pentagon Papers?

Did Claudette Colvin know in March 1955 when she was arrested for refusing to move to the back of the bus that only a few month later, Rosa Parks (a trained activist, BTW—her action was NOT random) would repeat Colvin’s action and become the face of a powerful and successful national civil rights movement?

Did whoever said something that opened the mind of a Nazi skinhead know that this particular tormentor (Christian Picciolini) would do a 360 and become a voice of outreach between the Islamic community and the racist right? [NOTE: That incident is not in the BBC link above but was mentioned by Picciolini in a talk he gave to Critical Connections, a human rights group in my area.]

Did the speaker (whose name I don’t know) at my first peace demonstration, at NYU Uptown (now Bronx Community College) on October 15, 1969, have any clue that one sentence of his speech would reach 12-year-old me and turn me into an activist for the past 56 years?

Did I know when I marched at Seabrook in 1977 and spent an incarcerated week as a “guest” of the state of New Hampshire that we were creating a national and international safe energy movement that kept us out of the nuclear fission fiasco for the next 40 years? (We have to do it again, now—that technology is far more about creating new problems than solving the existing ones. I wrote my first book on why nuclear fission makes no sense and updated it after Fukushima. We don’t need it and it’s quite harmful.)

Did the midwives of Exodus, Shifra and Pu’ah, know they were inventing nonviolent civil disobedience and that we would be using it to outsmart dictators more than 3000 years later?

I am an activist because my soul would not let me rest if I weren’t. I’ve been lucky enough to do a few things that worked, including starting the movement that saved a local mountain. But even when it’s defeat after defeat, I keep at it, knowing that if I change one mind or move one person to take action that day, my work has been worthwhile—and if I didn’t, I still made the effort.

Here are a few more examples:

What small step can YOU take that might turn into something much bigger—and where will you get the support to carry it out?

Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

By Posted on Posted in Activism, Democracy, Demographics/Psychographics, Diversity, Ethics in Government, language, Mindset, People Helping People, Politics, poverty, Psychology, Social and Economic Justice, Talking to the Other Side Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

I was not expecting to be totally blown away by a politician’s victory speech on Election Night. But I was moved to tears several times.

Whether you like his politics or not, you have to acknowledge his oratorical skills—both in the crafting of this speech and in the delivery, where he comes across to me as humble, inclusive, and committed. And if speaking is any part of your communications (which it should be), there are a lot of lessons in this speech.

The politician is Zohran Mamdani, just elected as the first Muslim mayor of New York City—a municipality with more population than 38 of the 50 US states.

You can view it at https://www.c-span.org/program/campaign-2025/zohran-mamdani-election-night-victory-speech/668370 (including the sweet family moment at the very end) and read the full transcript at https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/05/nyregion/mamdani-speech-transcript.html (I had to set up a free account to see it).

He hits high notes immediately, quoting Eugene Victor Debs, “I can see the dawn of a better day for humanity.” Debs ran for president as an open socialist—from his prison cell. Then Mamdani hits us with this powerful and poetic paragraph centering his working-class base:

Fingers bruised from lifting boxes on the warehouse floor, palms calloused from delivery bike handlebars, knuckles scarred with kitchen burns: These are not hands that have been allowed to hold power. And yet, over the last 12 months, you have dared to reach for something greater.

Next, a hat tip to his opponent, who he wishes “only the best in private life.”

Then came the only thing I would have edited out: “But let tonight be the final time I utter his name, as we turn the page on a politics that abandons the many and answers only to the few.” His deeper meaning is ambiguous, but it could be seen as holding some resentment, not wanting to even speak the opponent’s name again. I would have skipped the first clause and jumped to “We have turned the page on a politics that abandons the many and answers only to the few.” When I listened, I misheard the word “utter” as “honor,” and that may color my negativity toward the bit about not speaking his name.

But he pivots immediately to his mandate for change, for making the city affordable, and for including marginalized populations:

Thank you to those so often forgotten by the politics of our city, who made this movement their own. I speak of Yemeni bodega owners and Mexican abuelas. Senegalese taxi drivers and Uzbek nurses. Trinidadian line cooks and Ethiopian aunties. Yes, aunties.

He then tells stories of a few people he met during the campaign: a man who has to commute two hours each way because he can’t afford to live in the city, another who can’t afford to take a day off, and a woman who says she’d lost her love for her city.

His inclusiveness and focus on the glowing future expand to his enormous volunteer network:

This victory is for all of them. And it’s for all of you, the more than 100,000 volunteers who built this campaign into an unstoppable force. Because of you, we will make this city one that working people can love and live in again. With every door knocked, every petition signature earned, and every hard-earned conversation, you eroded the cynicism that has come to define our politics… To my campaign team, who believed when no one else did and who took an electoral project and turned it into so much more: I will never be able to express the depth of my gratitude. You can sleep now.

Then he acknowledges just how ambitious his goals are:

Central to that vision will be the most ambitious agenda to tackle the cost-of-living crisis that this city has seen since the days of Fiorello La Guardia: an agenda that will freeze the rents for more than two million rent-stabilized tenants, make buses fast and free, and deliver universal child care across our city.

Years from now, may our only regret be that this day took so long to come. This new age will be one of relentless improvement. We will hire thousands more teachers. We will cut waste from a bloated bureaucracy. We will work tirelessly to make lights shine again in the hallways of NYCHA developments where they have long flickered.

Safety and justice will go hand in hand as we work with police officers to reduce crime and create a Department of Community Safety that tackles the mental health crisis and homelessness crises head on. Excellence will become the expectation across government, not the exception. In this new age we make for ourselves, we will refuse to allow those who traffic in division and hate to pit us against one another.

From there, he segues directly into something even more ambitious: confronting a hostile federal government and the bigots who enable it—those who want to sow division and hatred, while he calls for unity and invokes, one after another, Jews and Muslims (two other groups who are often at odds on certain issues)—leading first with the community that he is not a member of, but that I am:

In this moment of political darkness, New York will be the light. Here, we believe in standing up for those we love, whether you are an immigrant, a member of the trans community, one of the many Black women that Donald Trump has fired from a federal job, a single mom still waiting for the cost of groceries to go down, or anyone else with their back against the wall. Your struggle is ours, too.

And we will build a City Hall that stands steadfast alongside Jewish New Yorkers and does not waver in the fight against the scourge of antisemitism. Where the more than one million Muslims know that they belong — not just in the five boroughs of this city, but in the halls of power.

No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in Islamophobia and win an election. This new age will be defined by a competence and a compassion that have too long been placed at odds with one another. We will prove that there is no problem too large for government to solve, and no concern too small for it to care about.

This next bit could sound like bravado—I’d love to hear some specifics on HOW he will meet those high expectations—but to me, it comes across instead as another call for unity and actual bravery: being willing to stand up and be counted—and looking ahead to what future would-be dictators we will need to organize against:

They want the people to fight amongst ourselves so that we remain distracted from the work of remaking a long-broken system. We refuse to let them dictate the rules of the game anymore. They can play by the same rules as the rest of us.

Together, we will usher in a generation of change. And if we embrace this brave new course, rather than fleeing from it, we can respond to oligarchy and authoritarianism with the strength it fears, not the appeasement it craves.

After all, if anyone can show a nation betrayed by Donald Trump how to defeat him, it is the city that gave rise to him. And if there is any way to terrify a despot, it is by dismantling the very conditions that allowed him to accumulate power.

This is not only how we stop Trump; it’s how we stop the next one. So, Donald Trump, since I know you’re watching, I have four words for you: Turn the volume up…

So hear me, President Trump, when I say this: To get to any of us, you will have to get through all of us. When we enter City Hall in 58 days, expectations will be high. We will meet them. A great New Yorker once said that while you campaign in poetry, you govern in prose.

If that must be true, let the prose we write still rhyme, and let us build a shining city for all. And we must chart a new path, as bold as the one we have already traveled. After all, the conventional wisdom would tell you that I am far from the perfect candidate…

He goes on to poke a bit of fun at himself, listing several characteristics that would have been thought of as liabilities—then proclaiming, “I refuse to apologize for any of this.”

And he concludes with inspiration: another strong call for hope:

Let the words we’ve spoken together, the dreams we’ve dreamt together, become the agenda we deliver together. New York, this power, it’s yours. This city belongs to you.

Again, I suggest that you watch the speech, take notes on what you feel did and didn’t work, and think about what you can bring to your own presentations.

Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

By Posted on Posted in Activism, censorship, Corporate Social Responsibility, Democracy, Diversity, Ethics in Government, language, Media Ethics, media-general, Mindset, People Helping People, Politics, propaganda, Protests and Crackdowns, Talking to the Other Side Tagged with , , , , ,

Are you as appalled as I am about the blatant suppression of dissenting voices in mainstream media lately? They’re even going after the court jesters—first Colbert, now Kimmel, and there will be others.

But we can express our displeasure. Here’s the letter I wrote to Disney, parent company of ABC (if you want to write your own letter, the address is responsibility@twdc.com).

Subject: Your removal of Kimmel was completely unjustified

Body:
I read the transcript of what Jimmy Kimmel said. I didn’t see any glorying in violence or in Kirk’s murder. What I read was the notation that “MAGA people” were “desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them.” (Source: USA Today: https://www.usatoday.com/picture-gallery/entertainment/tv/2025/09/17/jimmy-kimmel-show-photos/86209850007/)

The only part of that statement that is even an opinion is the word “desperately.” The rest is a statement of facts. See, for instance, Donald Trump calling it “radical left political violence” (https://time.com/7316299/charlie-kirk-shot-death-donald-trump-speech-transcript-political-violence/). In that same speech, Trump noted several instances of political violence against right-wingers—but he didn’t criticize the murder of MN lawmaker Melissa Hortman or numerous other attacks on liberals and progressives in that speech—see https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/09/11/donald-trump-charlie-kirk-melissa-hortman/86089962007/: “Hortman was not mentioned in Trump’s Sept. 10 address touching on several recent instances of political violence, including his own survived assassination attempt and the shooting Rep. Steve Scalise, R-Louisiana in 2017. He did not mention other attacks on Democrats including an arson attack at Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s house, a kidnapping plot against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and an assault on former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband in their home.”)

See also this article that cites SEVEN right-wing pundits blaming Democrats or the radical left for Kirk’s death: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/09/11/donald-trump-charlie-kirk-melissa-hortman/86089962007/

In short, Kimmel was forced out not for hate speech, but for reporting on a double standard that exists and is easily verifiable. Shame on you!

My wife and I were getting tired of Netflix and were planning to try Hulu. Guess what: you will not get a subscription from us. Nor will you be getting any admission fees at Disney properties. We will make other choices and do business with companies that do not try to suppress dissenters just to curry favor with a would-be dictator.

I have written four books on business ethics as a success principle. Your lack of ethics in this matter will not endear you to the millions of Americans who care about the business practices of companies they deal with.

Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

By Posted on Posted in Activism, Democracy, Diversity, General Commentary, Gratitude, Mindset, People Helping People, Psychology, Social and Economic Justice, Talking to the Other Side Tagged with , ,

Guest post by Robert Middleton (reprinted, with permission, from his August 19, 2025 newsletter):

Does the world feel upside down right now?

With news filled with images of the National Guard in D.C. and families separated by immigration crackdowns, you may wonder:

What difference could I possibly make?

The air is heavy with uncertainty.

Fear, anger, and confusion ripple through conversations, social feeds, and daily headlines.

In such times, the smallest acts of courage, kindness, and responsibility matter more than ever.

When history seems to be surging around us, it’s easy to dismiss the impact of day-to-day choices.

Keeping our heads down and worrying that things will get worse can make us feel powerless.

But what if you did something different? What if you chose to make a difference every day?

Instead of complaining, worrying, blaming, or lashing out, try this:

• Check in on a friend going through a rough patch. Let them know that you care and that you’re there for them.
• Support a local business owned by new Americans, as an act of solidarity, not charity.
• Contribute to a political advocacy group that’s supporting a cause you feel strongly about.
• Write a short note of gratitude to a teacher or healthcare worker who is coping with stress.

None of these actions will stop the world from spinning faster than we can keep up.

But each is a reframing—a choice to build up, not tear down, hope and connection.

During times marked by images of a nation’s capital occupied by military forces, or ordinary people rounded up and searched, public trust breaks down.

A collective sense of helplessness—and sometimes rage—sets in.

But when the macro feels out of reach, the micro is where we reclaim our agency.

• Kindness to a neighbor reminds both of you that not all relationships are defined by politics or fear.
• Speaking up—even quietly—for someone treated unjustly counters the narrative that cruelty is normal, or that no one cares.
• Choosing curiosity over numbness or judgment plants seeds of resilience and community.

These actions rarely make headlines.

Yet, like steady water wearing down stone, they have the power to shift neighborhoods, workplaces, and even families quietly back toward sanity and care.

You don’t need a five-step plan to save democracy, or an answer to every injustice.

What you do have—every day—is the opportunity to gently resist cynicism, isolation, and fear.

Sometimes, the strongest stand isn’t a shouted slogan or a march, but a persistent, small act of care that refuses to let the cruelty of the moment make us less human.

In these turbulent times, being someone who still tries—not perfectly, not heroically, but persistently, in your own way—is no small thing.

History may remember the leaders and the laws, but the future will be shaped by the quiet, daily choices that keep dignity and compassion alive.

And that difference, however humble, is always worth making.

If you can relate to this struggle to make a difference in turbulent times, I invite you to check out the M.A.D. Team website with a simple approach to making a difference. Take what you can and give a shot at putting the ideas into action.

Then, twice a month, join us on Zoom to share ideas for making a difference. The first date is Friday, September 5, at 12 noon Pacific (1MT/2CT/3ET). You can make your reservation now if you like!

Cheers, Robert

If you like this newsletter, please feel free to forward it to a friend.
They can subscribe here: https://ordinaryvisionaries.com/mad

Quote of the Day:

“The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not the turbulence; it is to act with yesterday’s logic.”
– Peter Drucker

Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

By Posted on Posted in Activism, Democracy, Ethics in Government, People Helping People, Politics, Social and Economic Justice, Talking to the Other Side Tagged with , , ,

This is fascism showing its ugly face. Unchecked, it will only get worse. First, read this post on Mighty Girl. Then TAKE ACTION! Trigger warning: Random ICE arrests of noncriminals are disturbing, and are affecting thousands of families these last few months. It’s important to verify these accusations, but I know this one is real because I read about Donna Kashanian’s arrest and detention in The Guardian, a paper I respect and support financially.

The Mighty Girl post offers several ways to support the victim, including contributing to a GoFundMe campaign—and writing a support letter. You’re welcome to borrow from my support letter (just below), which should be sent to sarah.r.gerig [at] gmail.com

Here’s what I wrote:
This administration promised us they would go after dangerous violent criminals. Yet the cases we hear about are nonviolent dissenters, a man who spent six weeks incarcerated in a country he was legally protected from being returned to after the government admitted his arrest was a mistake (but refused to help get him back until forced), numerous people attending their scheduled court hearings in good faith…and now, thousands of nonviolent noncriminals including Ms. Kashanian.

It does not make our country safer to snatch law-abiding residents who have informed the government of their whereabouts for years from their families and cruelly disrupt their lives. On the contrary, it creates a climate of fear where people are afraid to send their kids to school, afraid to seek medical attention (potentially spreading dangerous diseases that could have been treated and stopped, afraid to go to work (causing shortages and distressing the economy)…afraid of walking down the street or driving their car.

This is supposed to be “the land of the free and the home of the brave.” This is a country whose constitution specifically prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures.” This is a country founded on the principle that we have the right to a government that benefits the people: It’s right there in the Declaration of Independence that “whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”

I urge the immediate release of Ms. Kashanian and all those similarly arrested not because of criminal acts but because of who they are or what they stand for.

Shel Horowitz, Hadley MAFacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

By Posted on Posted in Democracy, Ethics in Government, language, Politics, propaganda, Protests and Crackdowns, Psychology, Social and Economic Justice, Talking to the Other Side Tagged with , , , , , , , , , ,

An acquaintance reposted a pack of lies from the rocker Ted Nugent. I’m not going to link to the original, but it will be easy to find. I responded thusly (uncapitalized quotes are directly from Nugent, who put his whole thing into one sentence):

 

I respectfully disagree. 1) Yes, Biden has some cognitive loss (so do I and probably so do you). Not nearly as much as T, who was reasonably coherent in his 2016 campaign but completely looney in 2024. And I’ve seen zero evidence that Biden knew about the cancer during his campaign. Where’s your evidence that he knew?

2) There is nothing mathematically impossible about Biden’s victory in 2020. Hate is a hard sell, and four years with T in charge was scary both for policy and for incompetence. OTOH, there is a LOT of strangeness about T’s 2016 numbers, eking out the narrowest victories in just enough swing states. It’s a lot easier to throw a few thousand votes than to throw hundreds of thousands. It just takes a few precincts.

3) “arrested anyone who contested it.” Nope. Arrested those who rioted, attacked police, destroyed government property, etc. But T is having people grabbed off the streets and thrown in foreign and domestic gulags for their political views and for their ethnicity.

4) “sanctioned an invasion.” Yes, Biden was horribly silent on the invasion of Gaza by Israel. But Nugent is more likely talking about immigrants at the Southern border, which was not an invasion. Invasions involve armed soldiers and instruments of war. What Hamas did on October 7, 2023 was an invasion, and so was Israel’s response. And so is the invasion by Putin against Ukraine—which Nugent is completely silent about.

5) “weaponized the courts, silenced speech” You mean the way T has done to a host of perceived enemies from prominent Democrats to Palestinian students? And T has also weaponized the DOJ, DHS, ICE, and several other agencies, not to mention attempting to blackmail colleges, universities, and law firms into suppressing dissent on his behalf and giving favors to him and his pet causes. Meanwhile, people being illegally kidnapped by daily ICE raids that violate any semblance of due process. Imagine what it feels like being dragged out of your car or home or required immigration hearing by heavily armed masked officers who refuse to show badges or warrants. The victims include many who are legally in the US, have immigration cases pending, and even a few who are citizens, and sometimes these kidnappings happen in front of their kids. And even those who are not here legally are entitled to due process they are not receiving. Imagine the anguish of Abrego Garcia, torn from his home and illegally deported by mistake (even according to the government) to a notorious prison in El Salvador for no reason, and now that government is refusing to lift a finger to get him back. Where is your outrage about that?

6) “turned the US into Sodom & Gomorrah”: I’m assuming Nugent is making a homophobic remark here. Personally, I’m delighted that people who love a partner who doesn’t fit the conventional mode now have the freedom to be public and even to marry. And I’ve read both the Old and New Testaments. Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because the visiting angels were threatened with violence (including rape) by a mob that surrounded Lot’s house. More like January 6, 2021 or Kristallnacht. Meanwhile, Jesus was all about love. Jesus defended immigrants, prostitutes, and the poor. He opposed war and violence in all forms. I suspect if He were alive today, Jesus would be attending Pride marches as a supportive ally.

7) Nugent’s post doesn’t talk about corruption. But he should, because T seems much more interested in monetizing the presidency than in actually running the country. The sheer scale of T’s corruption is unlike anything the US has ever seen. We’ve had massive bribery, selling access, squandering our hard-earned tax money to illegally sell crypto, and even accepting a “gift” superjet from a foreign government where he has business dealings. That plane is not only worth more than all gifts given to all previous presidents combined but will cost more than twice its stated value to bring up to security standards and then be turned over to T’s library when his term is over (so no future president gets to use this supposed gift to the nation). He accused Obama of spending too much time on the golf course, but he’s golfing almost every weekend, at enormous cost to the taxpayers. (Snopes estimated that just his first five 2025 trips to Mar-a-Lago cost taxpayers $22.2 million.) The whole sordid DOGE episode was all about vendettas and accumulating wealth and power for him and his billionaire friend who now, illegally, has access to the personal, supposedly private data about millions of our citizens. It didn’t save any money but it destroyed a lot of it.

His entire second term so far has been about greed, power, and repression. He’s carefully following the Project 2025 playbook, which in turn draws very heavily from what the Nazis did in the 1930s and 40s. Our democracy is at risk. Fascism CAN happen here. And that’s why I’m spending so much time writing pieces like this, marching in the streets, lobbying officials, and standing up for justice.Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

By Posted on Posted in Activism, Democracy, Ethics in Government, Innovation, Mindset, People Helping People, Politics, Social and Economic Justice, Talking to the Other Side Tagged with , , ,

Andrew O’Neill, Indivisible’s National Advocacy Director, briefed 152 attenders at the Northampton, Massachusetts chapter tonight. Although I already knew most of it, I took copious notes to help share this information. Here are those notes, lightly edited:

Summary: We’re in a race to build our power and stop the regime from building its repressive apparatus. 1% joined protests on April 5. Erica Chenoweth’s research shows that 3.5% actively protesting generally ensures political change. The other side is trying to slash Medicaid to create tax handouts for billionaires, govern via cronyism, and illegally eliminate rights and target dissenters.

Budget: Budget reconciliation could enable them to pass the horrible anti-human budget with only Republican votes. The giveaway to billionaires would shift not just more money but more power to the super-rich. They know this plan is unpopular so they’re not trying to convince Democrats to go along with it, but to ram it through using budget reconciliation. And unfortunately, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer didn’t try to block the reconciliation process when he could. He gave away that power without getting anything in return.

Late April and early May will be crunch time. That’s when they actually have to write down the budget items. So we’ve got to keep making Republicans accountable: showing up to district offices, town halls, public events…and blue districts can support that work. And Democrats need to fight back, loudly. Press releases aren’t enough. Speeches to empty chambers aren’t enough. Cory Booker went to extreme measures to make sure his message got through. Direct attention toward what the Republicans are doing (and the negative effects on their constituents).

Tariffs: These are unprecedently enormous. It’s hard to know where things stand on any given day. They say contradictory things. And it’s total chaos. This isn’t an economic policy plan. It’s not about fair trade but about grabbing power, DT wanting unchecked power. To punish enemies and reward loyalists. The throughline is that he wants loyalty to HIM. The same people getting the tax cuts are getting the tariff exemptions. He declared an emergency to push through the tariffs. And Congress has a tool to block that. They can turn OFF the emergency T declared and that ends the tariffs. This is a privileged resolution that can’t be filibustered and puts every senator on the record. Senator Ron Wyden has already introduced this resolution. In the House, they’re rigging the rules to make it harder to get a vote. But we can use a discharge petition if we can get 218 members (that would have to include a few Republicans). Greg Meeks has introduced it in the House. But even if we pass it in both houses, T will veto. We probably wouldn’t get the 2/3 majority to overturn the veto, but it will put them all on record.

Weaponizing the government against dissent: They will abuse their power to punish those who disagree and create fear of exercising our rights. We’re working closely with the ACLU and others. And we have a new toolkit on this specific issue. For those who live in states where the Attorney General is a Democrat, take action at https://www.bluestatedefiance.org/ice .

Another way they’re violating rights: 200 including Kilmar Abrego Garcia were sent to CECOT in El Salvador. Bukele even calls himself a dictator. It looks like pictures of the Holocaust, which we know because Republicans are going down there and taking photographs in front of it. And T said he wants to expand this to US citizens. So we need to sound the alarm and be really loud. Share the story of these people’s humanity. We have to demand that every elected official speak out and challenge this, including Republicans. This is about whether we have the rule of law, due process, and the Constitution. And of course, public protests. To show that not only are we powerful but we’re using that power to defend each other.

In the House, they are counting the whole session as one day, which limits the Democrats’ options to challenge the budget resolution. But the discharge petition gives us another way around Mike Johnson.

Opposing the regime: We are happy with anyone who is organizing against the regime. If we are not the organizers, we’re still happy that others are doing it. That might include economic actions such as buy-ins and boycotts and strikes. Indivisible focuses on government.

A lot of Democrats think the limelight is risky, they don’t want to attract haters. But then their message doesn’t get through at all. But throwing sand in the gears is how you get attention. If Republicans go on Fox to complain, that’s MORE attention for us. Think about how to get more people to pay attention, even while there are fewer newspapers, more channel dilution, etc. “Member of Congress writes milquetoast press release” is a guaranteed failure of attention.

When Chris Van Hollen of Maryland went to El Salvator and met with his constituent, that drove a ton of attention. And then Van Holen did every one of the talk shows, to get even more attention. We need to ask, if I were disappeared, would my Senator come and save me?

Budget markup is an opportunity for our Dem representatives to offer amendments, to negotiate and identify how outrageous they will go. But then, how do we make those moments splashy?

Just today, Rep. Don Bacon (R., Nebraska) was asked about Pete Hegseth’s leaks of top secret info on Signal chats. That’s a threat to national security and people like Bacon are upset about that. He would consider getting rid of Hegseth. We have to be creative about identifying and breaking off those chinks in the armor. We are also building tactics for people to support work in frontline red states. Tax breaks for billionaires paid for by Medicaid cuts are extremely unpopular, but now we have to spread the word that this is what they’re doing and hold Republicans accountable. They have to face that pressure NOW.

General Strikes: We have to look at what the conditions are to make this kind of resistance successful. It’s a highly effective tactic but you have to be willing to face retribution from your employer AND the state. We have to look at how many people would need to participate to make that work. We’d have to build the steps in all the sectors, organize the workers ahead of time, and not just the unionized ones. Several unions are timing their contract expirations for the same date, so that could lay the groundwork. All tactics need to be on the table and we have to evaluate what will work and how to sequence it.

How to get to the 3.5% of the population needed to overturn the regime? How do we reach more people? 1) Are there people who would join an Indivisible or 50501 or Working Families Party group who are ready to take action, and how do we find and integrate them? We continue to have new groups singing up with brand new people who haven’t been involved before. 185 new Indivisible groups in April so far!

Courage is contagious. A core audience for the protests are people driving by or getting off the bus with their protest signs. People think they can’t do anything about it, but when they see the community coming out, that changes. There’s also a set of people we disagree with on a lot of stuff but they’re organizable. They think the constitution is important, maybe the economy should work for us. We want to make sure they see that defiance works.

Public display of defiance is a muscle we build together. It gets stronger with use. Join with different collections of groups and individuals to work that muscle together. Remind them that it’s a marathon. It takes time, rotating tasks among different groups to avoid burnout while we build our next thing. For Mayday, we’re partnering with the Chicago teachers Union and many other organizations.

 

 Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

By Posted on Posted in Abundance and Prosperity, Activism, Consumer Issues, Democracy, Ethics in Government, General Commentary, Politics, Social and Economic Justice, Talking to the Other Side Tagged with , , ,

One of my right-wing Facebook acquaintances posted “No Virginia you cannot pay back thirty-six trillion in debt by taxing the rich” as a meme (lack of punctuation is his). Then he added this comment: “It’s the Elephant in the room nobody wants to address; how do we pay it back if we are adding to it by 1.8 trillion a year? Any Ideas? Anyone?”

So of course, I jumped in: “Having the super-rich pay their fair share is part of the puzzle. Other parts: 1) Reducing military waste, ending subsidies of fossil fuels, nuclear power, big tobacco, etc. 2) Ending imprisonment of undocumented immigrants who have committed no crime (coming to this country is NOT a crime, under international law) and drastically reducing imprisonment for nonviolent offenses in general. Imprisonment costs more than a university education! 3) Immediately kicking Elon out and freezing DOGE operations. Instead of finding inefficiencies to cut, they are CREATING inefficiencies and huge costs because they haven’t done their research, don’t know what they’re doing, and are closing programs that then have to be reinstated at a high cost over and above the cost of defending undefendable lawsuits, which also doesn’t come cheap. 4) And obviously, don’t extend the tax cuts from his first term. Oh, and by the way, the tariffs don’t save any money. All they do is add to the cost of goods.

If you want to know more, read and listen to people like Paul Krugman and Robert Reich, who have created oodles of documentation over the years. Better still, visit the National Priorities Project, https://www.nationalpriorities.org/interactive-data/trade-offs/, to find the cost of wasteful military spending in your community.”

My answer is tip-of-the-iceberg. There are hundreds of places to cut government waste—but Musk is going about it all wrong, using ideology rather than impact and utterly failing to pay attention to the good these programs do, and the damage to the US that is done every time he eliminates stuff, and the high cost of creating it again under court order. It also scares me that Musk has access to very personal data on government computers. To what ends will he use it? Judging by his history, he’s likely to sell it even though it doesn’t even belong to him. Whether he sells to commercial entities, foreign governments, or vigilante groups, that will not be good news for US citizens who don’t agree with his ideology.

Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

By Posted on Posted in Activism, Democracy, Demographics/Psychographics, Diversity, Energy & Sustainability, Ethics in Government, Marketing Techniques and Philosophies, media-general, Mindset, Peace and War, People Helping People, Politics, poverty, Protests and Crackdowns, Psychology, Social and Economic Justice, Talking to the Other Side Tagged with , , , , , , , , ,

“When they go low, we go high.”
—Michelle Obama

This week, two prominent Democrats gave opposite but equally crazy advice?

Thom Hartmann says we should open up the bag of Republican dirty tricks and start using them. And in what he calls a “daring” maneuver, Carville tells us in a New York times op-ed to “roll over and play dead.”

The above Carville link is for subscribers. I don’t have a sharing link.

Carville’s “plan” was properly shredded by Gil Duran of FrameLab, who says what I would have said:  Carville is ignoring the moral issue that real people are getting hurt. Democrats have to frame themselves as the opposition, loudly and clearly; silence is complicity. And principled resistance is what creates change (more on that in the What to Do section, below)

But let ME take on Hartmann, who usually talks sense. The moral arguments are obvious, but let’s talk about the impact in practice. And then we’ll talk about what to do instead.

  1. This makes us no better than them. If we use the same slimy methods, voters will just say “Tweedledum and Tweedledumber” and stay home—as millions of Biden voters did this past November. Just as we don’t accept violent terrorism to redress wrongs, so we should not accept disenfranchising others And if you think the so-called “stop the steal” movement that tried to steal back the 2020 election was bad, imagine if they actually had cause!
  2. Republican-lite has never worked for the Dems. Republican-lite gave us the impasse under Biden when Manchin and Sinema blocked progress over and over. A generation ago, Republican-lite brought us Newt Gingrich and his “Contract with America” (which progressives dubbed “Contract ON America,” in the hitman sense).
  3. For decades, Republicans have been “the party of  no”—and that includes “no, you can’t vote.” Denying others voting rights, even those we disagree with, would make Democrats also the party of “no, you can’t vote.” Democrats were that party in the segregated South during my childhood, and we all know by now what a huge mistake that was. Ironically, the Republicans are still criticizing the Dems for these old sins, even though, as Greg Palast notes, they themselves have taken voter suppression to new levels. But Harris had the chance to call out Republican voter suppression well in advance of the election, and according to Palast, her failure to push on this was why she lost.

In the 2024 election, failing to speak directly and meaningfully to the working class—coming across as yet another Republican-lite—led to the perception that Harris was an elitist who was beholden to corporate funders and was not in tune with white working-class people, despite policy platforms (that got little coverage) that were much more favorable to workers. Being too timid not only to beat a continuous drum calling out her opponent’s slide toward open fascism AND his cognitive decline but to mobilize an army of respected surrogates and send them into swing states to bring that message home over and over and over was a huge mistake. The country should have been flooded with messages about the harm that her opponent would do, his history of crime, and his repeated failures of competence.

Mind y0u, I think Harris also did a lot of things right, despite the truncated campaign. The focus on joy was brilliant. The promise to undo the damage of Dobbs (the Supreme Court decision that overturned Rowe v. Wade) was given full weight. The promise to be a president for all in the US, not just the Blue states, inspired many.

What to Do to Change This for Next Tuime

  1. We win more when we play bigger. I think the things that hurt the Harris campaign the most other than voter suppression of Democrats in Red states was her unwillingness to play big on certain issues. Being way too weak on Gaza almost certainly cost her Michigan—and was the reason multiple New Hampshire voters told me (when I knocked on their doors this fall) they weren’t voting for either presidential candidate. It would have been so easy for her to give a slot to Ruwa Romman, Palestinian-American legislator from Georgia, whose unity speech had been vetted by the Harris team. Flip-flopping her former correct opposition to fracking and barely mentioning climate change cost her many environmentalist votes. And she seldom addressed the elephant in the room of Republicans denying Democrats and poor people and people of color and people who didn’t want to catch a contagious disease the right to vote.
  2. We also win when we’re much more visible. There’s been a ton of grassroots organizing going on since the election—but with a few exceptions such as the Democratic legislators’ protest in front of the Treasury, it’s not showing up in the media, people don’t encounter it on their way to work, and non-activists don’t know it’s happening—because it’s been on Zoom rooms and inside houses of worship and college classrooms, and not out on the streets. This is a both-and. Do the organizing, do the lobbying, do the important but quiet stuff—but also get out there by the thousands and be seen! In my teen years, I went to a peace demonstration almost every weekend, many times boarding a charter bus from NYC to Washington to participate. Tens of thousands, sometimes hundreds of thousands, over and over again helped to bring that horrible war in Vietnam to a close. A few years earlier, the 1963 March on Washington and other massive demonstrations, plus people in the streets openly defying segregation, helped move a proud civil rights agenda forward into law, and gave LBJ the spine to back up those laws with enforcement. Even small actions can make a difference. Just 2000 people at Seabrook, New Hampshire in 1977 changed the course of US energy away from nuclear and toward renewables, when 1411 of us got arrested and held for up to two weeks. The sustained months of action at Standing Rock, opposing the Dakota Access Pipeline, started with just 200 people.
  3. The Dems have to combine Bernie’s anger and speaking truth to power, Kamela’s and Tim’s focus on joy, and AOC’s youthful energy and super-personable outreach that works equally well face-to-face or on video. (Note: the above link takes you to the links to all of my Facebook posts that mention her or share her work. It is open to the public; you should be able to view the videos and read the quotes even if you’re not on Facebook. If you want to pick one, go for the interview by Bernie, posted December 3, 2024.)
  4. As Bernie has done for years, they must focus on the class issue—not to the exclusion of its current constituencies, but intersectionally, inclusively. They have to recognize that the struggle for rights is the struggle for rights—whether those rights are denied for race, religion, gender, sexuality, economic position, class , age, ability, or any other category. This message has to be presented in ways that make all of these constituencies feel seen, heard, and valued: when one group gains, it “lifts all boats” and “makes the pie higher” for everyone; when one makes progress, it doesn’t take away from the others.
  5. Dems have to go to the Red states and Red audiences. Dems have to emulate Pete Buttigieg and get interviewed by MAGA media outlets like Fox—and do so as articulately and persuasively as he does. They have to reclaim populism and get in front of voters who wrongly saw the billionaire convicted-felon and serial-liar Republican candidate as populist.
  6. Democratic politicians have to be more outspoken. They need to cite real human tragedies resulting from these cruel policies and open hatreds by real people who’ve been hurt, name them, and tell their stories on the floor of the Senate and the House and at their Town Hall meetings back in their home districts. And they need to give copies in advance to the media and engage their base to pressure those media to show up and cover these statements.
  7. All of us need to widen our resistance tactics. In the pre-Internet, pre-COVID era, nonviolence scholar Gene Sharp listed 198 nonviolent social change tactics. Many more have been added since, including this list of 100 mostly digital nonviolent tactics. 21 more showed up when I searched for “nonviolent resistance techniques during covid.” And remember: governments typically fall when just 3.5 percent of the population stops complying and withdraws consent, according to research by Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan.

So join a group, get out there and make some of what the late civil rights icon and long-time Congressman John Lewis called “good trouble.”Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail