Adoptive Mother Takes Personal Risk Over Ethics Practices
Apparently, a lot of players in the international adoption world have been a little too glib about where these babies are coming from, and some children have been stolen from their parents to be adopted by people in the Northern hemisphere.
Even though it delayed and may have prevented her adoption, one adoptive mom, Jennifer Hemsley, got too suspicious. Her courageous battle with the system and great personal/family/financial hardship in order to do the right thing are a model of how to behave in an ethically cloudy situation, even if the outcome is the opposite of what you’re striving for.
Medical reports seemed obvious forgeries, without letterhead or doctor’s signature. And during a critical hearing, Hemsley said, her Guatemalan advisers tried to pay a stranger to pose as Hazel’s foster mother.
“Todd and I felt a lot like, ‘Gee, is this really happening?’ Maybe we should just look the other way and keep plodding along, because every time I tried to tell someone, nobody cared,” Hemsley said. “I couldn’t look the other way. I just couldn’t turn my head.”
Ricardo Ordonez, the Hemsleys’ adoption attorney, denied any fraud and vowed to clear his name by producing the birth mother for new DNA tests. Another court hearing is pending.
If the Hemsleys had walked away, as hundreds of other Americans did after problems surfaced, Hazel would likely have been abandoned or reoffered for adoption under another false identity, Tecu said. Instead, Jennifer Hemsley stayed with Hazel for months, draining more than $70,000 from a second mortgage on their home and paying for a trusted nanny.
[…] Adoptive Mother Takes Personal Risk Over Ethics Practices […]
[…] unknown wrote an interesting post today onPrincipled Profit » Adoptive Mother Takes Personal Risk Over …Here’s a quick excerptA blog about business ethics from Shel Horowitz, expert on business ethics as a success driver. This blog covers the intersections of ethics, politics, media, marketing, and sustainability. About Shel: Copywriter, marketing and … […]
This week a judge in the Netherlands decided that a 6 months old baby no langer can stay with its “parents”. Youthcare was asked to find a foster home for the baby. It became clear that the Dutch “parents” bought the baby via Internet from a couple in Belgium. This couple claimed it was forced to do so due to financial problems. Although not yet confirmed it is almost certain that an amount below the 10.000 euro was payed. A video (in Dutch) of the judge ruling can be found at https://www.nuvideo.nl/home/video/show/20799 (commercial included).
This week a judge in the Netherlands decided that a 6 months old baby no langer can stay with its “parents”. Youthcare was asked to find a foster home for the baby. It became clear that the Dutch “parents” bought the baby via Internet from a couple in Belgium. This couple claimed it was forced to do so due to financial problems. Although not yet confirmed it is almost certain that an amount below the 10.000 euro was payed. A video (in Dutch) of the judge ruling can be found at https://www.nuvideo.nl/home/video/show/20799 (commercial included).