Why I Don't Send HTML Newsletters
You’ve got to wonder about marketers who send those horrible emails where everything is in 8-point type all jammed on the left side of the page and completely unreadable. I own a one-trick-pony software app called SmartWrap that is designed to strip out all the > characters and bad line breaks in multi-quoted e-mail–but it’s also very useful for converting those scrunchy e-mails into something my 49-year-old eyes can handle. If only it supported the page-down key, I’d be all set.
As for my own newsletter prep: I do three monthly newsletters, all in plain text, none of them with pix. I could probably increase deliverability by posting the whole thing on a web page (we do archive them later, but only the main articles) and sending an email with a URL pointer–but I think the higher deliverability would be countered by the lower readership, especially as two of my newsletters target the frugality market and therefore can be expected to have higher-than-usual percentages on dialup.
When I was on dialup, pretty much the only outfit that got me to click to the web was MarketingSherpa.com; now that I’m on broadband, I’m considerably more willing.
However…as a recipient, I loathe HTML, find that in 98% of newsletters with graphics, the graphics are unnecessary–I keep them turned off, so for the most part, I don’t even see the “pretty” pictures–and 3/4 of the time I do turn them on for a particular newsletter, I wonder why they bothered.
As for PDF as an attachment versus a webpage, I’d let it be the reader’s choice. But I do remember that PDF downloads on the web were very annoying when I was on dialup–attachments were better, but only if they weren’t too huge. If a lot of readers are on dialup, it’s probably better to format a page in HTML and send a link. Or just post on a blog!
* * * *
Shel Horowitz is the award-winning author of Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts People First and five other books, and the creator of the Business Ethics Pledge to make crooked business as unthinkable in the future as slavery is today.
Good point, Shel. The argument I hear for html newsletters is that it gets your face – or the cover of your book – right there in someone’s inbox. According to one person, just the recipient seeing your face or book for a second before deletion makes it worthwhile.
But I’m with you. So many ezines are banned from my inbox these days it takes only one “junk mail” click to never have me see it again.
https://dvari.typepad.com/buzz
Good point, Shel. The argument I hear for html newsletters is that it gets your face – or the cover of your book – right there in someone’s inbox. According to one person, just the recipient seeing your face or book for a second before deletion makes it worthwhile.
But I’m with you. So many ezines are banned from my inbox these days it takes only one “junk mail” click to never have me see it again.
https://dvari.typepad.com/buzz